Mood:  chatty

David Icke - The Nature of Reality That We`re Experiencing

Posted by Neil Bartlett DHyp M.A.E.P.H at 00:01 MEST

Updated: Friday, 20 June 2014 02:04 MEST

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Mood:  a-ok

After Rick Simpson's efforts to introduce his hemp oil to the Canadian Health system were denied, even after proving it had cured many of his town's cancer patients free of charge, he realized the cancer industry doesn't want a cure.

Now, he's in exile in Amsterdam because he refused to stop helping his neighbors free of charge and he refuses to deny the effectiveness of his hemp oil for cancer.

Dr. Robert Atkins asserted there are already hundreds of cures for cancer.  His medical license was suspended for curing a woman's breast cancer with ozone therapy. (http://www.naturalnews.com/028201_ozone_therapy_FDA.html)

Insights from Dr. Burzynski's case

Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski had been hounded by the Texas medical authorities and FDA for 15 years, despite his success with difficult cancer cases while conducting clinical trials without outside funding.

A couple of major factors were disclosed by a recent documentary, "Burzynski: The Movie," AKA: Burzyinski: Cancer is Serious Business, FDA Tyranny."

The FDA receives half a billion dollars annually from Big Pharma's "user fees." These user fees help support the FDA financially and influence their fast track licensing of newly patented drugs.

The documentary fleshes out an intrigue where one of his formerly contracted researchers ran off to get approval for a higher phase of testing, but instead she colluded with another pharmaceutical company to steal Burzynski's patents.

What snowballed from this involved the National Cancer Institute and the FDA, and it's shockingly revealed from around one hour and fifteen minutes into the documentary to the end. You can view that portion of this well done documentary by accessing it from source below.

The cancer industry uses two main tactics in their war against cancer cures: If it's patentable, they will steal it and squash the original patent holder, as was attempted with Burzynski. If they can't patent or steal it, they will test it improperly in order to make it fail and discredit it.

Testing to ensure failure has occurred recently with Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez's efforts to get FDA approval for his updated version of Dr. William Kelley's successful 1970s cancer healing protocols.

This is also what happened when the Sloane-Kettering Cancer Institute tested Dr. Ernst Krebb's successful laetrile cancer treatments. (http://www.naturalnews.com/027088_cancer_laetrile_cure.html)

An attempt to hide a natural medicine had occurred with Canadian nurse Rene Caisse (Reen Case) and the American Indian formula she had used and named Essiac Tea. (http://www.naturalnews.com/026928_cancer_tea_cure.html)

The AMA under Dr. Morris Fishbein tried buying out Harry Hoxsey's herbal formulas, eventually forcing him to take his successful clinic to Mexico after years of court battles. Here's that drama. (http://www.naturalnews.com/027020_cancer_AMA_treatment.html)

Then, Fishbein and associates tried to buy into and take control of award winning scientist Royal Raymond Rife's electronic device that had been heralded in California circa 1940s as a real cancer cure. Rife was eventually ruined. (http://www.naturalnews.com/027104_cancer_WHO_Chi.html)

You're probably somewhat familiar with Dr. Max Gerson's methods for successfully curing cancer. His clinic was forced into Mexico where daughter Charlotte and her son continue after the medical mafia's harassment, which included attempts on Dr. Gerson's life and stealing clinical records. (http://www.naturalnews.com/027004_cancer_coffee_juice.html)

These are a few of the more notorious examples of why most cancer patients and well meaning doctors are kept ignorant of the 200-plus more effective and less toxic options when confronted with a cancer diagnosis.

There's too much money involved among the cancer industry's players, trillions of dollars, to permit any intrusions of inexpensive, effective, and safe cancer cures into the Medical Mafia's turf.

About the author:

Paul Fassa is dedicated to warning others about the current corruption of food and medicine and guiding others toward a direction for better health with no restrictions on health freedom. You can visit his blog at http://healthmaven.blogspot.com

Learn more: http://naturalnews.com

Posted by Neil Bartlett DHyp M.A.E.P.H at 00:01 MEST

Updated: Tuesday, 27 May 2014 01:10 MEST

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Mood:  mischievious

This is the era of hyper-tech espionage, encrypted emails and mindboggling cryptography. But you can hear a very old-fashioned form of espionage on shortwave radio.

It is 13:03 on a Tuesday in a cramped room with some fairly advanced radio equipment. What is suddenly heard on a shortwave receiving station is a 10-minute message in Morse code.

There is a small community of aficionados who believe messages like this are a throwback to the era of Cold War espionage. They are the mysterious "numbers stations".

At the apex of the Cold War, radio lovers across the globe started to notice bizarre broadcasts on the airwaves. Starting with a weird melody or the sound of several beeps, these transmissions might be followed by the unnerving sound of a strange woman's voice counting in German or the creepy voice of a child reciting letters in English.

Encountering these shortwave radio messages, many radio hams concluded that they were being used to send coded messages across extremely long distances. Coming across one of them was a curious experience. Radio enthusiasts gave them colourful names like the "Nancy Adam Susan", "The Lincolnshire Poacher," "The Swedish Rhapsody" or "The Gong Station."

The Lincolnshire Poacher was so named because of two bars from an English folk song of that name being used as an "interval signal".

Times have changed and technology has evolved, but there's evidence that this old-fashioned seeming method of communication might still be used. Shortwave numbers stations might seem low-tech but they probably remain the best option for transmitting information to agents in the field, some espionage experts suggest.

"Nobody has found a more convenient and expedient way of communicating with an agent," says Rupert Allason, an author specialising in espionage issues and writing under the pen name Nigel West.

"Their sole purpose is for intelligence agencies to communicate with their agents in denied areas - a territory where it is difficult to use a consensual form of communications," Allason says.

A former GCHQ officer, who does not wish to be named, whose duty was to intercept signals towards the UK and search for these numbers stations in the 1980s is also adamant that these were broadcasts to agents in the field or in residencies or directed to embassies.

It was "one-way traffic" - the transmitters broadcast numbers to the recipient. The recipient did not reply.

Why might the numbers stations have been used?

"This system is completely secure because the messages can't be tracked, the recipient could be anywhere," says Akin Fernandez, the creator of the Conet Project - a comprehensive archive of the phenomenon of numbers stations. "It is easy. You just send the spies to a country and get them to buy a radio. They know where to tune and when," he says.

Read More - BBC

Posted by Neil Bartlett DHyp M.A.E.P.H at 00:01 MEST

Updated: Tuesday, 22 April 2014 01:01 MEST

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Mood:  irritated

This is an old article from August 2007 which we feel is as true today as it was at the time of writing. We normally steer clear from such stories as we feel it adds nothing towards a harmonious world, but when social engineering is being committed by a government which has gone to war over similar actions of other states, then maybe it's time to speak and not be intimidated into silence - mindpotion.com

England is in the middle of a profoundly disturbing social experiment. For the first time in a mature democracy, a Government is waging a campaign of aggressive discrimination against its indigenous population.

In the name of cultural diversity, Labour attacks anything that smacks of Englishness. The mainstream public are treated with contempt, their rights ignored, their history trashed. In their own land, the English are being turned into second-class citizens.

This trend was highlighted this week by the case of Abigail Howarth, a bright teenager who applied for a training position with the Environment Agency in East Anglia but was turned down because she was too white and English. The post, which carries a £13,000 grant, was open only to ethnic minorities, including the Scots, Welsh and Irish.

Such social engineering was justified by the Agency on the grounds that minorities were under-represented in its workforce, the parrot cry used by bureaucrats throughout the public sector to justify bias against the English.

Though Abigail’s case rightly caused outrage, it was not unique. This kind of reverse discrimination is now rife across the state machine, underwritten by the very English tax­payers who are the targets of institutional prejudice.

Although it is technically illegal to restrict jobs to certain ethnic groups, the racially fixated commissars have found a way round that problem by developing training schemes open only to minorities. Under the 1976 Race Relations Act it is permissible to use racial considerations in recruitment to trainee positions such as the one to which Abigail applied. 

Such practices are dressed up as “positive action” to widen diversity and, in the words of one Labour council, “to overcome past discrimination”. So HM Revenue and Customs offers work experience jobs, worth up to £15,900 a year pro-rata, to ethnic minority graduates, while the Museums Association has two-year ethnic minority apprenticeships.

Similarly, Birmingham City Council gives £16,000 a year to “black and minority ethnic individuals” in its “Positive Action Traineeship Scheme”, and a £10,000 allowance to clerical trainees from “the Bangladeshi and Pakistani communities”.

Discriminatory training schemes can also be found in ITV, the civil service and the NHS, which boasts “a management development programme specifically designed and tailored to the needs of black and minority ethnic midwives”. 

It was revealed last year that Avon and Somerset constabulary rejected 186 applications from white men on the grounds that they were already “over-represented” in the force. In the same way, London Mayor Ken Livingstone last month refused to endorse a series of nominations for the London Fire Authority because they were dominated by whites.

And whole towns are beginning to suffer state disapproval. Eighty administrative jobs in the Prison Service have recently been transferred from Corby in Northamptonshire to Leicester because, as the Home Office admitted, Corby’s population is predominantly “white British”, a terrible sin in our multicultural society.

It is a bitter irony that the Labour Government, which works itself into such a synthetic rage over racial prejudice, should practise overt discrimination on an epic scale. The remorseless focus on supporting minorities has led to a perverted ideology of anti-white racism.

Read More - express.co.uk

Posted by Neil Bartlett DHyp M.A.E.P.H at 00:01 MEST

Updated: Thursday, 10 April 2014 02:01 MEST

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Mood:  d'oh

By Joseph Bast

This week, the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is releasing its latest report, the “Working Group II Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report.” Like its past reports, this one predicts apocalyptic consequences if mankind fails to give the UN the power to tax and regulate fossil fuels and subsidize and mandate the use of alternative fuels. But happily, an international group of scientists I have been privileged to work with has conducted an independent review of IPCC’s past and new reports, along with the climate science they deliberately exclude or misrepresent.

Our group, called the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), was founded in 2003 by a distinguished atmospheric physicist, S. Fred Singer, and has produced five hefty reports to date, the latest being released today (March 31).

So how do the IPCC and NIPCC reports differ? The final draft of the IPCC’s Summary for Policymakers identifies eight “reasons for concern” which media reports say will remain the focus of the final report. The NIPCC reports address each point too, also summarizing their authors’ positions in Summaries for Policymakers. This provides a convenient way to compare and contrast the reports’ findings.

Here’s what the reports say:

IPCC: “Risk of death, injury, and disrupted livelihoods in low-lying coastal zones and small island developing states, due to sea-level rise, coastal flooding, and storm surges.”

NIPCC: “Flood frequency and severity in many areas of the world were higher historically during the Little Ice Age and other cool eras than during the twentieth century. Climate change ranks well below other contributors, such as dikes and levee construction, to increased flooding.”

IPCC: “Risk of food insecurity linked to warming, drought, and precipitation variability, particularly for poorer populations.”

NIPCC: “There is little or no risk of increasing food insecurity due to global warming or rising atmospheric CO2 levels. Farmers and others who depend on rural livelihoods for income are benefitting from rising agricultural productivity throughout the world, including in parts of Asia and Africa where the need for increased food supplies is most critical. Rising temperatures and atmospheric CO2 levels play a key role in the realization of such benefits.

IPCC: “Risk of severe harm for large urban populations due to inland flooding.”

NIPCC: “No changes in precipitation patterns, snow, monsoons, or river flows that might be considered harmful to human well-being or plants or wildlife have been observed that could be attributed to rising CO2 levels. What changes have been observed tend to be beneficial.”

IPCC: “Risk of loss of rural livelihoods and income due to insufficient access to drinking and irrigation water and reduced agricultural productivity, particularly for farmers and pastoralists with minimal capital in semi-arid regions.”

NIPCC: “Higher atmospheric CO2 concentrations benefit plant growth-promoting microorganisms that help land plants overcome drought conditions, a potentially negative aspect of future climate change. Continued atmospheric CO2 enrichment should prove to be a huge benefit to plants by directly enhancing their growth rates and water use efficiencies.”

IPCC: “Systemic risks due to extreme [weather] events leading to breakdown of infrastructure networks and critical services.”

NIPCC: “There is no support for the model-based projection that precipitation in a warming world becomes more variable and intense. In fact, some observational data suggest just the opposite, and provide support for the proposition that precipitation responds more to cyclical variations in solar activity.”

Read More - forbes.com

Posted by Neil Bartlett DHyp M.A.E.P.H at 00:01 MEST

Updated: Thursday, 3 April 2014 01:49 MEST

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Mood:  loud

"7/7 What Did They Know?" is a new documentary from WideShut.co.uk, exploring the intelligence that was available to the police and security services prior to the July 7, 2005, London Bombings.

Officials claim they had no inkling of what was to befall London, but using newspaper reports, testimony and evidence from the inquest, the film reveals that Britain was warned continuously about threats to the Underground, actively planned to prevent them and had specific knowledge that two of the alleged bombers were involved in terrorist related activities.

More shocking is the evidence that during the 90s there was a semi-secret Government policy to allow extremists to operate in Britain and even send young men to terror training camps in Pakistan, when it suited Blair's foreign policy in the Balkans. Furthermore there's a possibility that extremists who surrounded the alleged bombers before the attacks had all at some point worked for British or allied intelligence agencies.

With the limited scope of the inquest, family members are still calling for an independent public inquiry to get to the bottom of this devastating tragedy.

For an extensive archive of 7/7 related information visit: http://julyseventh.co.uk

Posted by Neil Bartlett DHyp M.A.E.P.H at 00:01 MEST

Updated: Wednesday, 26 March 2014 02:19 MEST

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Mood:  irritated

Pills have become the solution to every problem. A new trend in psychiatry is the prescription of strong and toxic antipsychotic drugs to children with ADHD as well as other behavioral disorders. The "off label" use of these drugs can come with a host of dangerous side effects-effects much worse than the behavioral problems they are supposedly treating.

The type of antipsychotics being administered is considered "atypical" or second-generation meaning that they have only been on the market since the 1990s. Usually they are prescribed to adults with serious mental disorders such as bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. However, a study has shown that the amount of children being prescribed antipsychotics has increased seven-fold in an eight year period. Furthermore, adolescents are also showing increasing rates of antipsychotic prescriptions. Overall, while according to the study, every age bracket is being prescribed more antipsychotics today than in previous years, children and adolescents show higher rates of prescriptions than adults. Many of the prescriptions written to these children weren't even written by psychiatrists, but general practitioners who haven't been trained specifically in behavioral, cognitive, or mental disorders.

There are reasons that the numbers of antipsychotics prescribed for children with behavioral disorders is skyrocketing. The drugs show drastic improvement in the hyperactivity, irritability, and defiance associated with ADHD. The reason for this seeming improvement is the fact that these atypical antipsychotics act on the frontal lobe of the brain-the area lobotomies effect. Dr. Peter Breggin, who publicly decries the use of antipsychotics in children, has this to say:

"We have a national catastrophe. This is a situation where we have ruined the brains of millions of children...These are lobotomizing drugs. Of course, they will reduce all behavior, including irritability."

The use of these drugs is replacing other, perhaps more effective solutions such as therapy and family counseling as the children in the study were not shown to be receiving either. The medical industry is pushing the quicker, easier, yet more toxic solution to younger people.

Turning children with disruptive behaviors into chemically lobotomized zombies are not the only dangers of these drugs. The atypical class of antipsychotics is known for its list of dangerous side effects, which children are much more vulnerable to, including rapid weight gain, increase in blood pressure, metabolic abnormalities as well as a slew of disturbing neurological side effects. Tardive Dyskinesia is a permanent, drug-induced neurological condition which manifests itself through involuntary tics and jerks, and has been attributed to atypical antipsychotics. Dystonia, which causes painful, involuntary muscle contractions, has also been noted with these drugs as well as a more serious disorder which can kill a person within 24 hours-neuroleptic malignant syndrome. The most serious risk of all; however, is the risk of death to which there have been 45 pediatric deaths between the years of 2000 and 2004, where atypical antipsychotics was the primary cause of death, the FDA reported.

Have Americans become so lazy that they are willing to risk the lives of their children because they are a bit hyperactive? A healthful diet, plenty of exercise, or even therapy could all be utilized to improve the behavior of most of these "disruptive" children without turning to antipsychotics. Instead, children are being chemically lobotomized with drugs that can damage them for life.

Learn more: naturalnews.com

Posted by Neil Bartlett DHyp M.A.E.P.H at 00:01 CET

Updated: Wednesday, 11 December 2013 01:07 CET

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Mood:  incredulous

There is a Royal Bank of Scotland just off Spinningfields in Manchester, it's some sort of headquarters and generally the security don't run out and start making demands on the public highway.

Special thanks to Jamie the armed cop for providing some much needed comic relief. How do we go about sending you a Xmas card? (He was the cavalry last year when some chavs threw flash-bangers at me).

Posted by Neil Bartlett DHyp M.A.E.P.H at 00:01 CET

Updated: Wednesday, 4 December 2013 01:32 CET

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Mood:  a-ok

THRIVE is an unconventional documentary that lifts the veil on what's REALLY going on in our world by following the money upstream -- uncovering the global consolidation of power in nearly every aspect of our lives. Weaving together breakthroughs in science, consciousness and activism, THRIVE offers real solutions, empowering us with unprecedented and bold strategies for reclaiming our lives and our future.

http://www.thrivemovement.com/

Posted by Neil Bartlett DHyp M.A.E.P.H at 00:01 CET

Updated: Saturday, 16 November 2013 01:42 CET

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink

Mood:  irritated

GPs have been paid bonuses to put elderly patients on controversial ‘death lists’ in an attempt to save the NHS money by cutting the number of people who die in hospital.

They have been given £50 a time to draw up ‘end-of-life advanced care plans’ for patients they predict will pass away within a year.

The payments are designed to encourage doctors to start talking about death with elderly and seriously ill patients and to keep a record of where, ideally, they would like to die.

Those behind the ‘yellow folder’ scheme – so named as that is where the care plan forms are kept – insist its main aim is to give patients a  better death.

But critics say it was designed to save money and could result in  people being denied treatment or help. According to documents seen by The Mail on Sunday, a ‘key objective’ of the project, trialled in eastern England, has been ‘to shift the place of death’ away from hospitals so ‘reducing .  .  . healthcare costs’.

Every death that takes place outside of hospital saves the NHS almost £1,000, official calculations show. Average hospital deaths in England costs the NHS £3,065 but those elsewhere cost only £2,107.

Our latest report comes three months after The Mail on Sunday revealed ambulance crews can refuse to take extremely ill people to hospital if they have stated on their care plan they want to die  at home.

Dr Gillian Craig, a retired geriatrician, questioned why GPs were being offered an extra payment for having a difficult conversation.

‘Why should a GP be paid for this conversation, as opposed to any other?’ she said. ‘I feel doctors are paid very well and there should be no extra payments. Anything else is open to abuse and misuse.’

She also feared that patients signing up to die in their own home may unwittingly be ‘closing the door on potentially life-saving hospital treatment’. She explained: ‘A doctor may not realise that, while the person appears to be dying, they actually have a reversible condition.’

The GP bonus scheme rewarded doctors at 41 practices in Ipswich and East Suffolk, who were paid £50 for each care home patient they signed up to an end-of-life plan.

Patients were asked to stipulate where they would like to die, whether they wished to be resuscitated, and what drugs they wanted in their final hours. Ambulance services and out-of-hours doctors’ services were informed.

The family doctors were also asked to sign up elderly people living in their own homes, although they were not paid the £50 bonus in these cases. The ‘pilot’ project ran for two years from July 2011 to this September and was deemed ‘successful’.

Read more: dailymail.co.uk

Posted by Neil Bartlett DHyp M.A.E.P.H at 00:01 MEST

Updated: Monday, 21 October 2013 01:20 MEST

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink